All those who don’t read the below or uncontrollably wish to spit Civil War sound bytes need not answer.

"I pledge allegiance
To the Flag
Of the United States of America
And to the Republic
For which it Stands
One Nation
Indivisible
With Liberty and Justice for All"

This is probably one of the least scrutinized forms of "patriotism" we have today in our 50 United States. How many of you know anything about your Pledge or what "for which it stands"?

"Under God" is omitted here because it was not introduced until 1954 and thus cannot be a part of the "original" pledge (from 1892, by Francis Bellamy, a Christian Socialist who wanted the government to rule the economy using the strategies laid out by the Military Industrial Complex), even if people still run around upholding that by saying "preserve the original pledge."

SO LETS LOOK AT IT.

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America"

That means you pledge your life, your liberty, and your property to…a political union? "The United States of America", absent fascist or statist propaganda, is a political union. The greatness of a country is not found in flamboyant banners or patriotic jingles, it is found in the greatness of each individual citizen, each town and each city thriving in freedom. Swearing allegiance to central political unions allows for the growth of Empires and the death of the sovereign individuals and families that made the country great in the first place. By swearing allegiance to a central power, be it a King or a Congress, you betray your home and your roots, no?

"And to the Republic, for which it stands"

We do not stand for government, government stands for US. We do not serve government, government serves US. I do not find it ironic that an avowed Socialist thought inverting the roles of the ruling people and the servant government was a good idea. Socialism and Communism require as a rule servant people and ruling government.

"One Nation, Indivisible"

This is treason. We are 50 States. Fifty independent states that joined the Union voluntarily. As much as it is the right of a State to elect to join the Union, it is a right of the State to elect to leave the Union and only a fascist or dictator would say otherwise. In the Constitution neither is the power for the Federal Government granted to fight secession nor is the right of a State to secede barred. Therefore, a State may come or go as it pleases. "Indivisible" pretends otherwise and suggests we are a forced Union, unable to leave if that Union threatens liberty. There is no liberty in forced Union.

Again, we are 50 states, 50 little countries just as independent and diverse as, in theory, the many nations of Europe or those of Africa.

Anyone who disagrees with the right of a State to secede should re-read the Declaration of Independence: "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." –Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

"With Liberty and Justice for All"

There is nothing I know of that is wrong with this statement. This was a founding principle of the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

Let it further be noted that the only other country I know that has a "pledge" is the UK, and that is "God Save the King." I’ll let you imagine what that one teaches kids about the sovereignty of the people.

SO, is this seemingly innocent phrase we used to say every morning in fact undermining our very liberty by giving us the impression we are a Union, not a free country, and we serve the government rather than the government serves us?
@ missin’ the beach – # 1 argue of a fascist, the Declaration was not a law. (1) quote me where I said it was a law, (2) tell us why that matters. What was declared was the fact that government serves the people and if it does not do it’s duty then the people may change or remove it. That is a natural right and natural right void any laws that are made to interfere with them. A government may ban free speech but a human still has the right to free speech. I’m afraid you didn’t look hard enough into this.

You don’t understand the Civil War if you make a comment like that. If the desire of human beings to be free and sovereign ended, absolutely, all around the world, when Richmond fell in 1865 you would be correct. As I still fly my flag today I am testimony to that being false, and I know I am not alone.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,